Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 01 Jun 1999 15:50:12 -0400 | | From | Dave Cinege <> | | Subject | Re: XFS and journalling filesystems |
| |
Alan Cox wrote: > > > This should save about 10K. Other stuff is on the side like the extended > > attributes and they really don't impact the main code. > > > > Why do lines of code restrict what makes an fs ideal for an appliance or desktop? > > Lines of code directly influence size of code. > > If I have a kernel and compressed root file system on a 4Mb flash device > I'm not going to be terribly keen to move to a larger part for features I > don't need.
Also all that over head adds up.
Single user and minature systems usually gun for minimum latency for quickness in 'feel'. A server is more concerned with high rates of sustained transfer over a period of time; it doesn't care about the a few seconds lost here or there in the grand scheme of access.
-- http://www.linuxrouter.org/ Linux Router Project
Considering the country's population, of 230 million people, the U.S. government agencies maintain an average of 15 files on every man, woman, and child in this country.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |