Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 1 Jun 1999 02:13:04 -0400 (EDT) | | From | Gregory Maxwell <> | | Subject | Re: Migrating to larger numbers |
| |
On Tue, 1 Jun 1999, Ard van Breemen wrote:
[it's okay to be non-Y2.038K on 32bit cpus] > This is not a valid assumption, and there is 1 good example for that: > Y2K... > The idea that 32 bit will be obsolete is probably non-true. We are still > using 4 and 8 bit microcontrollers. By then a lot of 32 bit > microcontrollers will be common in regular appliances. Those appliances > will by then be more complex, and therefore need a base that already has > no time problems. > I can see the logica with the amount of users on a 32 bit system, but not > with the time. 38 years is not that long, and I know that there still will > be a lot of 32 bit controllers out there (and even 8 and 4 bit...)
Anyone who designs such an embeded device that cares about the time for anything other then human display should be SHOT anyways..
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |