[lkml]   [1999]   [May]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: performance & you-know-who
On 9 May 1999, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> Andrea Arcangeli <> wrote:
> >If the benchmark imply VM and I/O load, my tree will give a big boost (as
> >_worse_ a 10% improvement) and it's rock solid (I doesn't work by luck).
> According to what the mindcraft people reported about their runs
> earlier, the disk light is not actually on very much during the test:
> both Linux and NT keep the whole working set in memory.

I may be missing something, but it seems to me that the "working set in
memory" thing basically makes a nonsense of their claim that this is an
"enterprise-class" setup.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:51    [W:0.062 / U:1.692 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site