Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 6 May 1999 15:21:53 -0400 (EDT) | | From | Jason Smith <> | | Subject | Re: Ken Thompson interview in IEEE Computer magazine (fwd) |
| |
On Thu, 6 May 1999, Ian D Romanick wrote:
> > Even more important in a cluster is the ability to do a rolling upgrade. > Shut one system down while the other one stays up. Upgrade the OS on the > system that you shutdown and reboot. Do the same thing on the other system. > It's (in theory) the no-downtime OS upgrade. Can Linux or Windows do that? > I know that Solaris, Digital UNIX, and Sequent PTX can.
why would one OS be better than any other in something like this? I don't see any reason linux couldnt do something like this.
(please erase my ignorance)
> > -- > "I used to hang out by the food table at parties > because you don't really have to talk to anybody, > and if you do, you can talk about the food." > -- Jennifer Jason Leigh http://www.cs.pdx.edu/~idr/ > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |