Messages in this thread | | | From | "Kenneth D. Merry" <> | Subject | Re: Status of Linux SCSI generic implementation | Date | Thu, 6 May 1999 10:47:52 -0600 (MDT) |
| |
Joshua A. Johnson wrote... > Kurt Garloff wrote: > > > On Wed, May 05, 1999 at 11:07:20AM +1200, Max wrote: > > > what is the current status of this and what are the plans for the > > > future? Apparently there is a lot of hurt feelings on the side of the > > > creator of the famous cdrecord program... > > > > According to me, Jörg has some good points, and we should carefully read > > his discussion. > > IMHO, sg should be redesigned to make it better suitable for cdrecord and > > sane (the two main applications). I'm afraid, that in 2.2 not much can be > > done, because we don't want to change the interfaces. > > > > I don't know the sane authors, but I'd like to talk to them and to Jörg, > > when making the 2.3 sg driver. I would really enjoy, if they would help to > > design (and implement) an enhanced sg driver. > > > > The midlevel SCSI code needs reworking too, but his is definitely a 2.3 > > project. High-Level is OK, apart from sg, acc. to me. > > > > Regards, > > -- > > Kurt Garloff <garloff@suse.de> SuSE GmbH, Nürnberg, FRG > > Linux kernel development; SCSI driver: DC390 (tmscsim/AM53C974) > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > Forgive me if this has been addressed in the past. > > Is there any chance of getting a SCSI-2 CAM (Common Access Method) interface? > > Is there already one?
FWIW, FreeBSD has a mostly CAM-compliant SCSI layer.
Ken -- Kenneth Merry ken@plutotech.com
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |