lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [May]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: ia64: Patch 2.3.4pre1 looks fishy
On Thu, 27 May 1999, Horst von Brand wrote:

> I have no idea what is going on here, but this doesn't look right:
>
> diff -u --recursive --new-file v2.3.3/linux/fs/open.c linux/fs/open.c
> --- v2.3.3/linux/fs/open.c Fri Apr 16 14:21:39 1999
> +++ linux/fs/open.c Mon May 24 22:47:43 1999
> @@ -171,7 +171,7 @@
> return error;
> }
>
> -#ifndef __alpha__
> +#if !(defined(__alpha__) || defined(__ia64__))
>
> /*
> * sys_utime() can be implemented in user-level using sys_utimes().
>
> The last #if is supposed to match if __alpha__ is not defined, but __ia64__
> is. This is absurd, AFAIU they can't ever be both defined.
>

Maybe I'm an idiot (it wouldn't be the first time :) but doesn't it match
as long as neither alpha or ia64 defined? That is, some code which the
arches other than alpha and ia64 need. (hmmm... how much similarity is
there between ia64 and alpha I wonder...)

Jeremy

--
Jeremy Katz
http://linuxpower.org


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:52    [W:0.189 / U:0.204 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site