[lkml]   [1999]   [May]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRE: XFS and journalling filesystems
On Sat, 29 May 1999, Vilain, Sam wrote:

> In summary, I guess it is important that the filesystem not only performs at
> incredible speeds on high end SMP, but also it's best and average case
> performance on limited memory and IO machines is also good.

Is it essential that the smaller systems (ie. palm tops, perhaps even the
"home" user) utilize a journalling filesystem? Sure, they could take
advantage of the benefits, but is the additional use of resources worth
it? Although it'd add to the confusion, perhaps having two filesystem
choices wouldn't be an overly bad idea?


Mike Frisch Email:
Northstar Technologies WWW:
Newmarket, Ontario, CANADA

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:52    [W:0.118 / U:0.164 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site