Messages in this thread | | | From | "Vishal Rao" <> | Subject | Linux is a MicroKernal? [was Re: is Linux obsolete?] | Date | Wed, 26 May 1999 00:43:51 GMT |
| |
hi,
isnt linux a micro-kernel? i would think so! if we can config it to be a cool 400k in size with loadabel modules?
regards
----Original Message Follows---- From: "Stefan Monnier" <monnier+lists/linux/kernel/news/@tequila.cs.yale.edu> To: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: Re: is Linux obsolete? >>>>> "David" == David Leal <lorien@esoterica.pt> trolled: > developed today are microkernel based, e. g. Windows NT, GNU HURD, BeOS...
Nitpick: WinNT is *not* based on a microkernel.
> Looking at this, and realizing that Linux IS based on a system which is > 30 years old I ask the following question: How viable is Linux? Are we > (well, I mean you, because, as much as I would like, I haven't contributed > anything to the kernel yet) going in the right directions?
Does anybody care ?
Stefan
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |