lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [May]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectLinux is a MicroKernal? [was Re: is Linux obsolete?]
Date
hi,

isnt linux a micro-kernel? i would think so! if we can config it to be a
cool 400k in size with loadabel modules?

regards

----Original Message Follows----
From: "Stefan Monnier"
<monnier+lists/linux/kernel/news/@tequila.cs.yale.edu>
To: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu
Subject: Re: is Linux obsolete?
>>>>> "David" == David Leal <lorien@esoterica.pt> trolled:
> developed today are microkernel based, e. g. Windows NT, GNU HURD,
BeOS...

Nitpick: WinNT is *not* based on a microkernel.

> Looking at this, and realizing that Linux IS based on a system which is
> 30 years old I ask the following question: How viable is Linux? Are we
> (well, I mean you, because, as much as I would like, I haven't
contributed
> anything to the kernel yet) going in the right directions?

Does anybody care ?


Stefan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/


______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:51    [W:0.056 / U:0.140 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site