lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [May]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Is this the correct list for NFS probs (2.2.x kernels) ?
From
Date
Dave Airlie <airlied@csn.ul.ie> writes:

> I've been able to do this at some stages , I'm not sure how much of forced
> umount works but when I was messing around with NFS/TCP code, I remember
> being able to umount -f the disk which killed any processes in the D
> state,
>
> Not sure though if the server is gone down what happens, my case was I had
> hosed parts of it ..
>
> Dave.
>
>
> On Mon, 24 May 1999, G. Allen Morris III wrote:
>
> > It would be nice if it was possible to force an unmount of
> > nfs mounts. This may even be in the works.
> >

The thing to remember is that this is likely to leave the nfs client
(and possibly the RPC layer) in a bad state, with writebacks and
requests left in a limbo state. We need to do quite some work before
this sort of thing becomes a 'safe' alternative.

Cheers,
Trond

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:51    [W:0.079 / U:0.960 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site