Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 25 May 1999 10:52:14 -0400 | From | Sam Roberts <> | Subject | Re: is Linux obsolete? |
| |
Mark Lord wrote: > > David Leal wrote: > . > > about monolithic kernels vs microkernels. I noticed most OSes being > > developed today are microkernel based, e. g. Windows NT, GNU HURD, BeOS... > > Err.. you missed a few less obscure ones: Linux, FreeBSD, Solaris..
Err.. did you misunderstand the enumeration? Or is your definition of micro-kernel enormously flexible? What common O/S service is supported outside of the kernel on any of those 3 systems? (note that modules are part of the kernel once they are loaded)
Sam
> -- > mlord@pobox.com > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |