Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 18 May 1999 23:45:48 +0200 | | From | Manfred Spraul <> | | Subject | Re: ext2 question |
| |
Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > Right now I think a journaled fs can blame a logging fs in global > performances (I am not talking about write performances while the log is > not wrapping around).
AFAIK, NTFS implements journaling with a logging fs: they implemented 2 filesystems: the actual NTFS, and a logging fs (called LFS) which is stored in a fixed size file on the volume. I guess that the LFS is only written (and read during fsck).
The wraparound is a huge problem: you might recall the one of the tweaks which Mindcraft did on NT was: 'set the size of the log to a incredibly large number' (65 MB). (the default should be somewhere around 4 MB, but the system gets nearly stopped if the log overflows) -- Manfred
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |