[lkml]   [1999]   [May]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Stupid MS challenge
    On Sat, 15 May 1999, Riley Williams wrote:

    > Hi Gregory.
    > > I think that if Linux does go ahead with the rematch, we add the
    > > following added requirements:
    > ===8<=== CUT ===>8===
    > > Finally, the test should be run in continous mode for *1 month*...
    > Be sensible!!! "1 month" depends on who's measuring it, and when. The
    > test should run in continuous mode for 5 weeks, which is a much more
    > precice measurement of time...
    NT doesn't run anything for more than a day. It stays up, but the
    applications always stop. This is considered "normal" by M$. Even
    M$'s C++ environment needs to be rebooted between compiles or it
    won't link.

    Running a benchmark for a month will guarantee that even a CP/M
    machine will beat NT in overall performance, even if the database
    is on 96k, hard-sectored, single-sided floppies that have to be
    changed by hand.

    Dick Johnson
    Penguin : Linux version 2.2.6 on an i686 machine (400.59 BogoMips).
    Warning : It's hard to remain at the trailing edge of technology.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:51    [W:0.024 / U:42.644 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site