Messages in this thread |  | | From | Andi Kleen <> | | Subject | Re: Is /proc/*/mem broken? | | Date | Sat, 15 May 1999 11:09:42 +0200 |
| |
In muc.lists.linux-kernel, you wrote: >LS, > >Well, the subject says it all. I just discovered that on my >2.2.7 and 2.2.8 machines /proc/1/mem no longer gives meaningfull >information: > > cat: /proc/5703/mem: No such process > >Hmm, just noticed that even 2.0.32 gives the same error. I think >i'm barking on the wrong tree here? Is'nt this a catable file?
You have to PTRACE_ATTACH it first (I guess that is useless SYSV heritage) I'm pretty sure that 2.0 required it too.
I would propose to drop this silly requirement in 2.3, and instead forbid the really bad uses of /proc/*/mem (e.g. mmaping /proc/self/mem causes lots of problem in the VM subsystem, unfortunately dosemu depends on it)
-Andi
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |