Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 16 May 1999 09:30:55 -0500 (CDT) | From | Brian <> | Subject | Re: most stable 2.2.x kernel? |
| |
On Sat, 15 May 1999, George Bonser wrote:
> On Sat, 15 May 1999, Steve Dodd wrote: > > > What was the 2.2.7 crash you had? > > I have had a rather busy website have problems with processes getting > "stuck" in D state. 2.2.5 has been flawless. These are SMP P-II 450Mhz > w/symbios SCSI and Intel dual Pro 100+ cards. > > 5 systems now in production 1 was running 2.2.7. It ran just fine under > no/low load conditions for about three days before live traffic was > switched to it, problems occured within minutes after going live. I did > not have the luxury of having any time to troubleshoot the problem so I > backed out to 2.2.5 in a hurry and it has been running well ever since. > > The 2.2.5 systems have been in production for just a little over a week > now. I am really eager to try 2.2.9 but my fingers still smart from 2.2.7. > The performance numbers I have seen in the kernel list look nice.
I was running 2.0.35 in production on about 10 machines. I have not had any luck with 2.2.7 or 2.2.8, but trying 2.2.9 now.
> > >
----------------------------------------------------- Brian Feeny (BF304) signal@shreve.net 318-222-2638 x 109 http://www.shreve.net/~signal Network Administrator ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881)
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |