lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [May]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Slashdot shitheads
Date
Shaw Terwilliger wrote the following:
>
> On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 10:46:45AM +0100, alex@eos.co.uk wrote:
> > The press release on slashdot made no distinction between the 2.2.x and
> > 2.3.x kernels, unfortunately.
>
> There really isn't any distinction to be made, other than one has a 2
> in it and one has a 3.

For now. What of the future? Maybe a note to slashdot would be appropriate
then putting in code intot he kernel which destroys data (as was initially
suggested by alex).

--
CaT (cat@zip.net.au) URL: http://www.zip.com.au/dev/null

For a bad joke read:

http://www2.hunterlink.net.au/~ddhrg/censorship_legislation.html


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:51    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans