lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [May]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: Slashdot shitheads
    Date
    Shaw Terwilliger wrote the following:
    >
    > On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 10:46:45AM +0100, alex@eos.co.uk wrote:
    > > The press release on slashdot made no distinction between the 2.2.x and
    > > 2.3.x kernels, unfortunately.
    >
    > There really isn't any distinction to be made, other than one has a 2
    > in it and one has a 3.

    For now. What of the future? Maybe a note to slashdot would be appropriate
    then putting in code intot he kernel which destroys data (as was initially
    suggested by alex).

    --
    CaT (cat@zip.net.au) URL: http://www.zip.com.au/dev/null

    For a bad joke read:

    http://www2.hunterlink.net.au/~ddhrg/censorship_legislation.html


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:51    [W:0.022 / U:245.460 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site