lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [May]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.2.8_ikd1.bz2
Mike,

The question was not "which one is better". Old "good" Joseph Stalin would
most likely say "both are better" ;)

The question was "which one to merge into IKD and possibly maintain
separately (at least in 2.2.x series but maybe integrate in 2.3.x series -
I agree with Scott there)"

Regards,
Tigran.

On Wed, 12 May 1999, Mike Galbraith wrote:

> On Wed, 12 May 1999, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
> > About the debugger, now there should be an updated kernel debugger by
> > David Grothe <dave@gcom.com> somewhere, and I seen also a debugger from
> > SGI. Which is the better one to merge in the ikd tree?
>
> I don't know about better, as I haven't had a chance to try David
> Grothe's debugger yet. Scott Lurndal's kdb has found a permanent
> home in my box.. get's a 'Two Thumbs Up' here (fwtw).
>
> -Mike
>
>


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:51    [from the cache]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and my Meterkast|Read the blog