Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 13 May 1999 10:04:23 +0200 (CEST) | | From | Mike Galbraith <> | | Subject | Re: 2.2.8_ikd1.bz2 |
| |
On Thu, 13 May 1999, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> Mike, > > The question was not "which one is better". Old "good" Joseph Stalin would > most likely say "both are better" ;)
Guess I could agree with good (coz he's dead) old Joe on _something_ ;-)
> The question was "which one to merge into IKD and possibly maintain > separately (at least in 2.2.x series but maybe integrate in 2.3.x series - > I agree with Scott there)"
Perhaps I worded that poorly. When I used 'better', there was an implicit 'to merge' stemming from the context of the question. I was saying that I consider the one to be a fine tool and therefore a candidate for possible inclusion in the ikd tool-box, but cannot comment on the other because I haven't seen it (yet).
-Mike
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |