: On Wed, 12 May 1999, Dax Kelson wrote:
: > 
: > I thought that 2.3.x development was going to use Larry's BitKeeper, which
: > supposedly is an enhanced CVS type system that fixes the quality assurance
: > issues that Linus was concerned with.

Linus said:
: I probably _am_ going to switch to bitkeeper, but I wanted to open 2.3.x
: even before Larry had given me the real demo etc. 

If you are coming to Linux Expo, we will have a booth and at that booth
we will have BitKeeper, docs on BitKeeper, and a pass at the linux kernel
all shoved into one repository.  Please stop by and check it out.  

There will also be a BitKeeper BOF, I think it is 7:30PM Thursday, which
is where you should come to get an overview of BK and to discuss its usage
for the kernel development process.  Please attend it you can.

: BitKeeper doesn't imply any quality assurance either, but it _should_ make
: it easier to keep in sync.

That's the plan and I think we'll get there pretty soon.  I suspect we
will have growing pains but BitMover is prepared to focus almost 100%
of its engineers (we're up to 4) on making this stuff work for the Linux
kernel team.

See you at Linux Expo!

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/