lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Apr]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: GNU/Linux stance by Richard Stallman
On Mon, Apr 05, 1999 at 10:18:15AM +0300, Alexander L. Belikoff wrote:
>
> Not sure. Although '--help' and '--version' act as exceptions, they
> also create a rule: every program must identify itself and provide
> some help. After all we are not talking about spiffy copyright string
> here. I think the advantage of making UNIX more user friendly is well
> worth it.
>
> Of course, this will definitely break some pereverted script that
> calls 'true' with the arguments above. :-)

It may not be perverted. What if you have a script that has the option of
excluding a certain command from running (think of the weird stuff in
autoconf) so you use
$(COMMAND) "$@"
a lot in your script and COMMAND="/usr/bin/frob" but if /etc/nofrob exists
you set COMMAND="/bin/true" which effectively turns off $(COMMAND) without
the need for a if/fi block around EVERY call to it and it always succeeds.

Unless someone puts --version into the command line (which may not get
sucked up by your script if the "$@" was a $3 instead!

To me, that doesn't sound like a very perverted situation, but that may say
something about me :-)

--
[======================================================================]
[ Kevin Lentin Email: K.Lentin@cs.monash.edu.au ]
[ finger kevinl@fangorn.cs.monash.edu.au for PGP public key block. ]
[ KeyId: 06808EED FingerPrint: 6024308DE1F84314 811B511DBA6FD596 ]
[======================================================================]

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:51    [W:0.049 / U:2.828 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site