[lkml]   [1999]   [Apr]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Performance Comparision
> > Thats not a meaningful test btw. The glibc headers take longer to compile
> > because of all the extensive standards features and optimisations.
> >
> > A valid compile test would be to build say the BSD ones with a BSD
> > target compiler on BSD and Linux.
> >
> > Alan
> Well, this are the facts with the same hardware different OS.

You could equally say "bash compiles faster on Linux than XFree86 on BSD"

Meaningful benchmarking is quite an art. The Hint values themselves Im sure
are good benchmark info for some things. The 'it compiles at a different speed'
benchmark is not unless you use the same compilers headers, linkers and final

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:51    [W:0.040 / U:0.492 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site