Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 25 Apr 1999 18:00:26 -0500 (CDT) | From | Matthew Vanecek <> | Subject | Re: Linux Tuning: Objective |
| |
On 25 Apr, William F. Maton spewed forth: :: On Sun, 25 Apr 1999 teamwork@freemail.c3.hu wrote: :: :: > Should it be a depository of patches? :: > :: > Should it be one or more howtos? :: > :: > Should it be a mailing list (linux-perf) :: > doing the Q & A style of thing? :: :: I think all of the above. However, as has been pointed out, one's idea of :: perf-tuning is different from another's, comparing what's quoted above to :: what's quoted below. For example, I think of perf-tuning in terms of :: network data transfers: :: :: http://www.psc.edu/networking/perf_tune.html :: :: > Should it be a web site where people :: > can go in and hit the "SCSI" button if :: > they want to know if they can tune their :: > Linux machine's SCSI devices? :: > :: > Or should it be all of the above? :: :: I think it should be as broad as possible, but it would also have to be :: very well organized: system tuning, network tuning, video-subsys tuning, :: etc. ::
Something along the lines of RDBMS might be appropriate for organization. A searchable knowledge base or something similar would be nifty, as well as a hierchical organization. Hmm, hierchical may even be better than relational in this case.
-- Matthew Vanecek Course of Study: http://www.unt.edu/bcis Visit my Website at http://people.unt.edu/~mev0003 For answers type: perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5,(41*2),sqrt(7056),(unpack(c,H)-2),oct(115),10);' ***************************************************************** For 93 million miles, there is nothing between the sun and my shadow except me. I'm always getting in the way of something...
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |