Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sat, 24 Apr 1999 11:20:30 -0700 (PDT) | | From | Tim Smith <> | | Subject | more on that fork problem |
| |
[Recap: I and others occasionally see fork fail with EAGAIN for no apparent reason. In particular, we are nowhere near any limits on the number of processed, either system wide or per user. In my case, this was on a busy web server that started failing non-root forks at around 170 total processes, although root could fork at least 50 more processes with no problem]
I've got more information on this. The server I was seeing this problem on was rebooted, and now it is either gone, or the limit has moved way up. Looking around at memory usage, number of open files, and /proc/slabinfo, I don't *see* anything different between now and when the machine was limiting forks. Everything that I can think to notice is basically the same as it was a few days ago, when the problem was still present, except the update was around 20 days then, and is now at 4 hours. It sure sounds like some kind of resource leak. This is a 2.2.4 kernel on an SMP system.
If anyone has any suggestion as to how to track this down, feel free to send them. The one constraint is that I only have ssh access to the server, and I can't install and run test kernels.
--Tim Smith
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |