Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: mutexs for synchronization between kernel threads? | | From | Andi Kleen <> | | Date | 22 Apr 1999 11:14:37 +0200 |
| |
Patrick MOUROT <pm@sxb.bsf.alcatel.fr> writes: > > Sorry for disturbing....but i have a hot (at least for us) question : > Do you encounter any Priority Inversion or deadlock with Mutexes or > Semaphores (regarding to spinlock) ??
AFAIK Linux 2.2 makes no attempt to handle priority inversion in any locking code. so yes. Deadlocks are always easy with any locking primitives.
-Andi
-- This is like TV. I don't like TV.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |