lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Apr]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: mutexs for synchronization between kernel threads?
From
Date
Patrick MOUROT <pm@sxb.bsf.alcatel.fr> writes:
>
> Sorry for disturbing....but i have a hot (at least for us) question :
> Do you encounter any Priority Inversion or deadlock with Mutexes or
> Semaphores (regarding to spinlock) ??

AFAIK Linux 2.2 makes no attempt to handle priority inversion in any
locking code. so yes. Deadlocks are always easy with any locking
primitives.

-Andi

--
This is like TV. I don't like TV.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:51    [from the cache]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and my Meterkast|Read the blog