lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Apr]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    Date
    SubjectRe: Linux Tuning.


    On Tue, 20 Apr 1999, Greg Lindahl wrote:

    @>
    @>> PS. I had this idea when I noticed that precious 256 bytes are wasted for
    @>> modprobe path and wanted to make it tunable...
    @>
    @>This is an excellent example of something that's not worth tuning.
    @>
    @>-- g
    @>

    Admitedly, 256 bytes is a bit of nothing, but people trying to cram
    linux into extreme small memory machines, perhaps for embedded applications
    are interested in reducing any unneeded memory consumption. The linux-lite
    people might have different ideas about tuning, than someone with a fat
    router. Whatever the 'linux tuning' project results in, I hope at its core,
    it creates _information_; what can you do, and what it means, and why.
    Once the information is gathered, you can package it up in different
    ways, according to various biases.

    Paul



    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:51    [W:0.018 / U:29.164 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site