lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Apr]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: setuids() like setgroups() ?
Date
In article <cistron.m10Y8Ia-0007TvC@the-village.bc.nu>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
>Passing uids is only one way of solving the problem though. All the other
>methods continue to apply. Uid passing lets you have centralised credential
>services.

Indeed. The other thing I was thinking about would be something like

struct switchuid {
uid_t uid;
uid_t uid_range;
gid_t gid;
gid_t gid_range;
};

int setswitchuids(size_t size, struct userids list[]);
int getswitchuids(size_t size, struct userids list[]);
int switchuid(struct userids *);

However, this is very non-standard and the cances of this getting
implemented are very low, I guess. The reason I am asking this is that
I am considering hacking Apache and the kernel for UID swtching -
wondering if it should be a quick&dirty local hack, or something reasonably
clean so I can try to get it integrated into Linux and Apache.

>No more setuid login programs - login has to provide authentication to
>the authentication server and then it will get a uid back if valid.
>Its also about 200 lines of code if that for the kernel

Aha, that would be SCM_SETCREDENTIALS ? I'm curious about this. It
seems to be the easiest (and most probable) solution for now.

Mike.
--
Indifference will certainly be the downfall of mankind, but who cares?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:51    [W:0.068 / U:0.188 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site