[lkml]   [1999]   [Apr]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Capabilities, this time in elf section

David L. Parsley writes:

> Well, the stickybit/immutable solution has been modified so that it can
> be compatible with local fs tools, but is still not completely secure with
> remote fs's. Still, nfs at least should understand the sticky bit, and if
> you can trust the security of the sticky bit on the remote system, it _is_
> possible to use caps with a mount option.

Ugh. Immutable does not survive backup and restore. The sticky bit
is not even secure on a Linux 2.2 server.

> I hope you're both following my thread with Pavel Machek, where I have
> shown showstopper problems with the setuid0 scheme. It just doesn't
> implement capabilities, but rather mutates them badly in order to work
> with the setuid0 scheme.

Not so fast. You didn't discover any showstopper problems.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:51    [W:0.087 / U:1.604 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site