Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 13 Apr 1999 17:08:53 -0400 | From | hellraiser <> | Subject | Re: Another 2.2.5 crash, and it's not X, dammit! |
| |
are you sure you don't have any processes running that reboot the system at a certain time?
Dan Reish wrote: > > This time, the system spontaneously rebooted, rather than just freezing. > Neither of these things has _ever_ happened to me, as far as I can remember, > while using a finished stable kernel (1.0.9, 1.2.13, 2.0.29+), so I don't > buy the "It's probably X" argument. It's theoretically possible, but not a > reasonable assumption with the current evidence, limited as it is. I'd > sooner believe hardware failure, since that's happened on my system before. > > Once again, there was no Oops message written to /var/log/messages. > > I guess about the only useful information from this is that 2.2 is not yet > as stable as it will be, and people who need it for high-availability > applications should wait a while longer (or help fix bugs). > > -- > Dan > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |