lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Apr]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Another 2.2.5 crash, and it's not X, dammit!
are you sure you don't have any processes running that reboot the system
at a certain time?


Dan Reish wrote:
>
> This time, the system spontaneously rebooted, rather than just freezing.
> Neither of these things has _ever_ happened to me, as far as I can remember,
> while using a finished stable kernel (1.0.9, 1.2.13, 2.0.29+), so I don't
> buy the "It's probably X" argument. It's theoretically possible, but not a
> reasonable assumption with the current evidence, limited as it is. I'd
> sooner believe hardware failure, since that's happened on my system before.
>
> Once again, there was no Oops message written to /var/log/messages.
>
> I guess about the only useful information from this is that 2.2 is not yet
> as stable as it will be, and people who need it for high-availability
> applications should wait a while longer (or help fix bugs).
>
> --
> Dan
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:51    [W:0.682 / U:0.188 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site