Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 12 Apr 1999 18:09:06 +0100 (GMT) | From | Mike <> | Subject | Re: syscall accounting ? |
| |
On Fri, 9 Apr 1999, Matti Aarnio wrote:
> To implement this, the task struct would need a syscall counter, > and every syscall would inc it. Also a global syscall counter > would need to exist -- make that a 'per processor' counters. > Reading them at /proc/something could be allowed not to show quite > up to date data, and thus no need to have e.g. spinlocks. > Surely it would be cleaner to increment the syscall counters from arch/i386/kernel/entry.S (or equivalent on other architectures) rather than in every syscall?
-- Mike <rickettm@ox.compsoc.net>
I've run DOOM more in the last few days than I have the last few months. I just love debugging ;-) (Linus Torvalds)
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |