[lkml]   [1999]   [Apr]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PFC]: hash instrumentation
On Sun, 11 Apr 1999, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

>>but this also means that you should be *very* careful where you put your
>>"touch_buffer(bh)" because you don't want that in a performance path like
>>find_buffer(). leaving touch_buffer() in bread() and brw_page() might be
>Hmm, yes probably this is a good idea, I'll think about that tomorrow.

I think to have fixed the lru-list-mkyoung performance problem in
find_buffer/find_page (and looking at the ext2 code the only place where
we must touch a buffer is getblk and not get_hashtable or find_buffer!). I
am releasing a new 2.2.5_arca10.bz2 that should perform better under
no-VM-kernel intensive operation (like a kernel compile), but will be
_equally_ good (or better!) in preserving the working set under heavy
swap. With the latest changes I did today _here_ again responsiveness
under swap is _impressive_ and I suggest _everybody_ to try it out.

Thanks to Chuck for the good hints.

Andrea Arcangeli

PS. with the help of some no-i386 guy this last arca-patch should compile
also on sparc and alpha (and maybe other archs).

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:51    [W:0.047 / U:6.916 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site