lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Apr]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: ext3 to include capabilities?
ADC> You gain so little (nothing?) over an executable header, and you lose
ADC> so much compatibility. You waste inode space and risk having buggy
ADC> filesystem code.

ADC> Better way:

ADC> 1. Put capabilities information in the executable header.
ADC> 2. Mark the executable setuid root.
ADC> 3. Have the kernel check for #1 if #2, and prefer #1 if present.

What if I make a new executable and make its header say it implies
CAP_whatever? Probaly I have looked over something...

--
Meelis Roos (mroos@tartu.cyber.ee)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:51    [W:0.109 / U:0.700 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site