lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Mar]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Linux Buffer Overflow Security Exploits
On Thu, 4 Mar 1999, Steve Dodd wrote:
> I guess it depends /which/ 16bit CPUs. 68000 was technically a 16bit CPU,
> but it had 24 address bits (tho' only _23_ address lines, but that's different
> brain damage :) Actually, didn't it have 32 bit wide data registers? Maybe it
> wasn't a 16bit CPU after all..

32bit registers, 24bit address bus (but bit 0 was always unset), 16bit
data bus.

-Dan


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:50    [W:1.164 / U:0.052 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site