Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 4 Mar 1999 12:28:23 -0800 (PST) | From | Dan Hollis <> | Subject | Re: Linux Buffer Overflow Security Exploits |
| |
On Thu, 4 Mar 1999, Steve Dodd wrote: > I guess it depends /which/ 16bit CPUs. 68000 was technically a 16bit CPU, > but it had 24 address bits (tho' only _23_ address lines, but that's different > brain damage :) Actually, didn't it have 32 bit wide data registers? Maybe it > wasn't a 16bit CPU after all..
32bit registers, 24bit address bus (but bit 0 was always unset), 16bit data bus.
-Dan
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |