Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 4 Mar 1999 02:12:18 +0100 (MET) | From | Ricardo Galli Granada <> | Subject | Re: More NFS Bugs (QUESTION) |
| |
On Thu, 4 Mar 1999, Alan Cox wrote:
> > - In a 2.0.36 nfs client, OK. > > - In a 2.2.1 client, BAD!!!!???? > > > > The three machines have user space nfsd v2.2b37 > > Am I missing something? > > Yes - NFS now does locking to the server you want "nolock" as an NFS option > for 2.0 [mis]behaviour
Thanks Alan.
Should I understand from Alan words that locking is not possible (or it's wrong) with 2.0.36 but it's ok _just_ among 2.2.x kernels?
Is there any difference between knfsd and nfsd regarding locking capabilities? I understand it doesn't, am I wrong?
BTW, I tried to understand what knfsd package really does (to use kernel nfs) and differences with u/nfsd, I am depressed...
Thanks.
-- Ricardo Galli
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |