Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 27 Mar 1999 13:49:23 -0600 (CST) | From | Matthew Vanecek <> | Subject | Re: Linux 2.2.4ac1 |
| |
On 27 Mar, Thomas Wouters spewed forth:
:: This is getting peculiar :) I have a very similar AMD, :: processor : 0 :: vendor_id : AuthenticAMD :: cpu family : 5 :: model : 8 :: model name : AMD-K6(tm) 3D processor :: stepping : 12 :: cpu MHz : 400.924185 :: fdiv_bug : no
Is it a real 400, or did you OC? I've just not OC'd mine yet, and don't really know if I ever will.
:: :: You wont ever see mtrr in the cpuflags for a non-intel processor :) It works :: now, though. I might run some benchmarks if i find some time, this weekend. :: Regardless, Matthew, you should have /proc/mtrr on 2.2.4-ac1. I can send :: along my .config to see if anything significant is different ? :: :: Regards, :: Thomas.
No, that's Ok. I'm not sure who's patch to get, though, Alan's or Richard's. Decisions, decisions! Are there implications in going one way or the other? How about when 2.2.5 is released; how well will that patch work? I've never really done in-between patches before.
-- Matthew Vanecek Studies in Business Computers at the University of North Texas http://www.unt.edu/bcis Visit my Website at http://people.unt.edu/~mev0003 ***************************************************************** For 93 million miles, there is nothing between the sun and my shadow except me. I'm always getting in the way of something...
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |