[lkml]   [1999]   [Mar]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: 3dfx - a security hazard?

    On Fri, 12 Mar 1999, David Luyer wrote:
    > Because if you want anyone to be able to play games, you give them 3dfx
    > access - ideally you'd want a group 3dfx[1]. If there's a way to crash the
    > system with 3dfx, then you're not providing 3dfx properly, and you're just
    > inviting people to introduce a security hazard.
    > The same is definitely not true of /dev/mem - access to that is definitely
    > restricted, and everybody knows that [or should].

    Sorry, still not convinced. :)

    Saying to a user who has just written his new flight simulator which
    requires access to /dev/mem "oh no - access to this device is definitely
    restricted!" is exactly the same as saying to another user whose new game
    needs access to /dev/3dfx "oh no - this device is a security hole, can't
    give you access to that!".

    No difference, really.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:50    [W:0.018 / U:5.152 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site