lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Mar]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: 3dfx - a security hazard?
Date
From

Tigran wrote:

> I am probably missing something, but access to both /dev/3dfx and (e.g.)
> /dev/mem is controlled by filesystem permission rules. Writing garbage to
> either will crash the entire machine. Why is one a security hazard and
> another is not?

Because if you want anyone to be able to play games, you give them 3dfx
access - ideally you'd want a group 3dfx[1]. If there's a way to crash the
system with 3dfx, then you're not providing 3dfx properly, and you're just
inviting people to introduce a security hazard.

The same is definitely not true of /dev/mem - access to that is definitely
restricted, and everybody knows that [or should].

David.

[1] or group d3fx, due to issues with quotas and users/groups starting with
numbers....

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:50    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans