lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Mar]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: Linux/IA-64 byte order
    Date
    In article <Pine.LNX.3.95.990309085803.6758B-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>,
    Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com> wrote:
    >I don't expect people to track my kernels, for example, unless they are
    >doing real kernel development. Some people still do, but most people
    >obviously don't want to.

    Integration and testing are important too.

    One want to bang on the development series before it becomes "stable."
    2.2.0 is no good if it doesn't run on your hardware.

    One might also want to get early access to device support in development
    kernels that is not present in the stable ones, but in that case it's a
    matter of tracking both the current Linux kernel and some third-party
    patches or a module.

    >So why are kernel modules so different? And why are "system programs"
    >different (I don't mind occasionally breaking programs like "ifconfig" and
    >"modprobe" etc, for example)?

    Another reason for tracking the kernel. Better to learn that 'ipfwadm -V'
    has no replacement in 2.2 early, and try to get a replacement put in before
    2.2's release, than to complain about it afterwards.

    --
    Zygo Blaxell, Linux Engineer, Corel Corporation, zygob@corel.ca (work),
    zblaxell@furryterror.org (play). It's my opinion, I tell you! Mine! All MINE!
    Size of 'diff -Nurw [...] winehq corel' as of Wed Mar 10 12:14:00 EST 1999
    Lines/files: In 2058 / 29, Out 5773 / 59, Both 7821 / 85

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:50    [W:4.929 / U:0.140 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site