lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Feb]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Subjectsys_write can return -EFAULT instead of -EDQUOT
    Date
    From
    With kernel 2.0.36, when a write syscall tries to write beyond a user's
    quota on an ext2 filesystem, it can return -EFAULT instead of -EDQUOT.

    The process involved was a mail delivery utility called tmail (part of
    imap-utils which complements the UW imapd package). The user (a test
    username) was at or just below quota. tmail was trying to deliver into
    an INBOX file (in mbx format) which already existed of size 2766 bytes.
    strace showed tmail doing roughly the following:
    open("/foo/bar/INBOX", O_RDWR|O_CREAT, 0600) = 5
    fstat(5, {st_mode=0, st_size=2766, ...}) = 0
    lseek(5, 2766, SEEK_SET) = 2766
    write(5, "09-Feb-1999 13:22:55 +0000,26208"..., 56) = 56
    write(5, "Received: via tmail-4.1(10) (inv"..., 26208) = 1276
    write(5, "********************************"..., 24576) = -1 EFAULT (Bad address)

    This was reproducible. The above strace, however, is reconstructed
    from memory. The two figures 26208 and 1276 are the only things I'm
    not certain I've remembered correctly (just in case the problem
    depends on precise details of 512-block v. 4k page things).

    After deleting files to go back under quota and then going back to
    just under/at the quota limit, the write started giving EDQUOT as
    expected.

    I've looked though fs/read_write.c, ext2/file.c, ext2/inode.c and
    ext2/balloc.c and tried to follow the call chain sys_write,_file_write,
    ext2_getblk, ext2_getblk/block_getblk, ext2_alloc_block, ext2_new_block
    and I can't find anywhere where an EFAULT would creep in (it's
    certainly seems not to be from a verify_area). Could it possible be
    from somewhere like ext2_getblk where there are some lines like
    "bh = inode_getblk" which aren't checked for NULL returns? They could
    fail for quota reasons (perhaps unexpectedly in the middle of
    allocating several blocks for indirect stuff) and the callers could be
    trying to do something nasty by writing to never-created buffers.

    --Malcolm

    --
    Malcolm Beattie <mbeattie@sable.ox.ac.uk>
    Unix Systems Programmer
    Oxford University Computing Services

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:50    [W:0.022 / U:0.248 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site