Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Proxyarp is not working with kernel 2.2.0 | From | Andi Kleen <> | Date | 03 Feb 1999 16:23:28 +0100 |
| |
In article <199902021849.VAA23780@ms2.inr.ac.ru>, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru writes: > Hello! >> In article <m107gGP-0007U1C@the-village.bc.nu>, >> >> The problem is that noone stood up to write a proxy arp daemon yet.
> I promised and promise again, if someone will explain why > he needs subnet proxy arp, it will be ready the next evening.
I don't know why, I have never seen a use for it that couldn't be solved with routing table changes @)
> What's about different outputs of "arp -a": > ceratinly, it is deal of taste, but to my not-very-well breed taste, > 2.1 gives much nicer and intelligible output. 8)8)
What do you mean?
> PS Hurra! I understood why I send empty messages sometimes! > I hope, previous one is the last one.
Cool.
-Andi
P.S.: I hope your don't limit ICMPs to localhost patch makes it in soon - the problem bite me just recently.
-- This is like TV. I don't like TV.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |