Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 28 Feb 1999 04:39:20 -0800 (PST) | From | Alex Belits <> | Subject | Re: MOSIX and kernel mods. |
| |
On Sun, 28 Feb 1999, Dan Hollis wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Feb 1999, Mike A. Harris wrote: > > Obviously. The point is that using the hypothetical Microsoft > > situation, Microsoft could devise a patch to the kernel which > > does what they need, creating the interfaces/API's they need, > > etc, and GPL it, releasing source. Then write a BINARY only > > module which calls their GPL'd API. With their market clout, it > > would be possible for this bastardized Linux version to rise in > > popularity, possibly overtaking our standard kernel. > > 1) It would have to be an *extremely* compelling binary module if it were > to truly *overtake the standard kernel*. Somehow, I dont see this > happening. > > 2) If it were *that* compelling, it would indicate a gaping hole that > Linux needed to fill. > > 3) You can bet the developers would be raising a stink about it all the > way :-)
Apache frontpage extensions.
-- Alex
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Excellent.. now give users the option to cut your hair you hippie! -- Anonymous Coward
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |