[lkml]   [1999]   [Feb]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Kernel 2.2.1 and sysvinit 2.76 possible bug
> I see.  So tanking the whole unit is better.  That way, if no one is

If there is no init your machine is dead. How can the kernel reparent a
task to a task that doesnt exist for example.

> flexibility as to how to proceed in this dire situation (ie. an opportunity
> to carry out some other task perhaps, before cycling). I would suggest
> that the behavior on loss of init be a toggleable /proc/sys/kernel switch.

Pick. Oops crash maybe reboot v Reboot

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:50    [W:0.041 / U:5.232 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site