[lkml]   [1999]   [Feb]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Kernel 2.2.1 and sysvinit 2.76 possible bug
    > I see.  So tanking the whole unit is better.  That way, if no one is

    If there is no init your machine is dead. How can the kernel reparent a
    task to a task that doesnt exist for example.

    > flexibility as to how to proceed in this dire situation (ie. an opportunity
    > to carry out some other task perhaps, before cycling). I would suggest
    > that the behavior on loss of init be a toggleable /proc/sys/kernel switch.

    Pick. Oops crash maybe reboot v Reboot

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:50    [W:0.017 / U:43.696 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site