lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Feb]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Kernel 2.2.1 and sysvinit 2.76 possible bug
    On Thu, 25 Feb 1999, Alan Cox wrote:

    > > flexibility as to how to proceed in this dire situation (ie. an opportunity
    > > to carry out some other task perhaps, before cycling). I would suggest
    > > that the behavior on loss of init be a toggleable /proc/sys/kernel switch.
    >
    > Pick. Oops crash maybe reboot v Reboot

    Why not add panic to the list? At least that way you have some hope of
    syncing your filesystems. Otherwise, I would pick Oops crash and maybe
    reboot (hopefully not ;)

    -bp
    --
    B. James Phillippe . bryan@terran.org
    Software Engineer, WGT Inc. . http://www.terran.org/~bryan


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:50    [W:0.021 / U:0.676 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site