lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Feb]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Kernel 2.2.1 and sysvinit 2.76 possible bug
On Thu, 25 Feb 1999, Alan Cox wrote:

> > flexibility as to how to proceed in this dire situation (ie. an opportunity
> > to carry out some other task perhaps, before cycling). I would suggest
> > that the behavior on loss of init be a toggleable /proc/sys/kernel switch.
>
> Pick. Oops crash maybe reboot v Reboot

Why not add panic to the list? At least that way you have some hope of
syncing your filesystems. Otherwise, I would pick Oops crash and maybe
reboot (hopefully not ;)

-bp
--
B. James Phillippe . bryan@terran.org
Software Engineer, WGT Inc. . http://www.terran.org/~bryan


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:50    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans