[lkml]   [1999]   [Feb]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRE: howto disable auto route setup?
No. is not legal for a Class C network (194.111.0) as a
subnet mask on an interface. You could have that "mask" in a routing
protocol that can use summaries or CIDR, such as OSPF, but you should not be
able to configure that on an interface. In effect, you can't have a
"reverse" subnet mask, it has to be at least as significant as the network
itself. An interface that is using an IP from a Class C network must have
at least a mask. The resulting broadcast address that you
mention is also illegal.

If you were using a Class A or Class B network (1 - 191.255) a subnet mask
of is perfectly fine. So, if you were using 190.111 instead
of 194.111.0 you could have a subnet mask of with a broadcast
address of Your first subnet would be unless
you use the not-really-legal-but-supported-by-most-router-vendors option of
zero subnet masks
(and-not-really-advisable-unless-you-know-what-you-are-doing). Your last
subnet would be, as there is no "option" of
all-ones-subnet-mask from any vendor AFAIK and it would not make much sense
because, although you may be able to get away with using the all-zero's
subnet portion of the IP because broadcasts to "this" subnet are not used
often, you probably can't get away with all-one's because broadcast to "all"
subnets are used often.

Check out the RFC's if there is a question in the HOWTO's. They are
authoritative, while the HOWTOs are rewrites for the lay person that are not
necessarily authoritative.

Someone correct me if I'm wrong on any details.

What has this to do with the kernel?


> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> []On Behalf Of Neil Conway
> Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 1999 8:53 AM
> To: Mike Jagdis
> Cc: Sam Mortimer;
> Subject: Re: howto disable auto route setup?
> Vaguely on this topic, I've been wondering if it's
> legal/advisable/safe
> to have a netmask like ?
> Anyone? The HOWTO is rather ambiguous about it. I think it's legal,
> but am not entirely sure. This also seems to imply a
> broadcast addr. of
> something like for a network address of,
> presumably that's OK too?
> cheers
> Neil
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to
> Please read the FAQ at

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:50    [W:0.077 / U:1.252 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site