Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 16 Feb 1999 12:22:27 +0000 (GMT) | From | Matthew Kirkwood <> | Subject | Re: Q: void* vs. unsigned long |
| |
On Tue, 16 Feb 1999, Alan Cox wrote:
> > rank(long long int) >= rank(long int) >= rank(int) >= rank(short int) > > >= rank(char) > > If that definition has been changed the C9X committee are broken. On X86 > for example short=long in size. Anyone who expects all the compilers to ^^^^^^^^^^ I assume you didn't mean that :)
> change their object sizes is to say the least misguided.
Especially on architectures which don't have four or five different integer sizes...
Matthew.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |