lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Feb]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Q: void* vs. unsigned long
On Tue, 16 Feb 1999, Alan Cox wrote:

> > rank(long long int) >= rank(long int) >= rank(int) >= rank(short int)
> > >= rank(char)
>
> If that definition has been changed the C9X committee are broken. On X86
> for example short=long in size. Anyone who expects all the compilers to
^^^^^^^^^^
I assume you didn't mean that :)

> change their object sizes is to say the least misguided.

Especially on architectures which don't have four or five different
integer sizes...

Matthew.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:50    [W:0.064 / U:0.212 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site