Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 12 Feb 1999 11:32:26 +0200 | From | Petri Kaukasoina <> | Subject | Re: kernel 2.0.36 - 486 DX2 - clock skew? |
| |
On Thu, Feb 11, 1999 at 05:39:03PM +1300, Chris Wedgwood wrote: > This reminds me -- does xntpd/ntpd really need to lock it all of its > pages?
I have never let it lock the pages in workstation use and it has still worked ok. Just comment out "#define HAVE_MLOCKALL 1" in config.h after configure.
If you want to use it as a server you might want to use locking but to get a smaller memory footprint you might want to link xntpd statically so that it won't lock the pages of the shared libc.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |