lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Feb]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: proper place to discuss kernel 'bloatedness'?
On Tue, 2 Feb 1999, Ben Hutchings wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 01, 1999 at 01:44:55AM +0100, Marek Habersack wrote:
> > And where would you split the kernel? What makes a linux machine a server is
> > not the kernel, but the various daemons SERVING some kind of service. The
> > kernel "merely" provides a medium for those daemons - networking, file
> > systems, access to hardware etc.
>
> As a gross generalisation in the PC world:
>
> The computers with all kinds of funky SCSI controllers and network
> settings and no `multimedia' drivers are `servers'.
>
> The computers with IDE, sound cards, maybe TV and radio cards too,
> and quite simple network setup are `workstations'.
>
> It would be short-sighted to set these generalisations about drivers
> `in stone', though.

I think the key idea here is that a "server" spends most of its time
talking to other computers, and various perpipherals, while a
"workstation" spends most of its time talking to humans. (Both can be
high-bandwidth, high-computation tasks, these days.)

Unfortunately, any long term difference between the two seems to be
minimal -- as Microsoft demonstrates quite nicely by shipping NT
"workstation" and NT "server", which are identical except for some tuning
parameters and the bundled doodads and daemons.

--
Kenneth Albanowski (kjahds@kjahds.com, CIS: 70705,126)



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:50    [W:0.141 / U:0.492 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site