[lkml]   [1999]   [Dec]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: timer_bh behaviour incorrect for 2.2.13?

    On Thu, 9 Dec 1999 wrote:

    > You can borrow solution from softnet. It accumulates once ran softirqs
    > to mask and exit only when all pending BHs are ran once.

    yep, although i think this does not solve William's problem: if TIMER_BH
    gets marked by a timer interrupt _after_ it has been run, then we miss the

    -- mingo

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:55    [W:0.018 / U:139.592 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site