lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Dec]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: timer_bh behaviour incorrect for 2.2.13?

    On Thu, 9 Dec 1999 kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru wrote:

    > You can borrow solution from softnet. It accumulates once ran softirqs
    > to mask and exit only when all pending BHs are ran once.

    yep, although i think this does not solve William's problem: if TIMER_BH
    gets marked by a timer interrupt _after_ it has been run, then we miss the
    event.

    -- mingo



    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:55    [W:0.018 / U:30.320 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site