[lkml]   [1999]   [Dec]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: timer_bh behaviour incorrect for 2.2.13?

On Thu, 9 Dec 1999 wrote:

> You can borrow solution from softnet. It accumulates once ran softirqs
> to mask and exit only when all pending BHs are ran once.

yep, although i think this does not solve William's problem: if TIMER_BH
gets marked by a timer interrupt _after_ it has been run, then we miss the

-- mingo

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:55    [W:0.088 / U:2.708 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site