Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 7 Dec 1999 09:46:49 -0500 (EST) | From | William Montgomery <> | Subject | Re: [patch] Re: setitimer lowlatency-2.2.13-A1 questions |
| |
On Tue, 7 Dec 1999, Ingo Molnar wrote: > have you also fixed start_atomic_bh()/end_atomic_bh() in a similar manner? > Whoops, I saw that mentioned but did not implement. Will do that now, could that be the cause? Sounded SMP to me.
> if you are using ktrace it's probably simpler to use a 'dummy' empty > function which you call only if the bad condition happens. Thus it will > show up in the ktrace. > Neat trick. You guys are amazing.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |