lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Dec]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] Re: setitimer lowlatency-2.2.13-A1 questions
On Tue, 7 Dec 1999, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> have you also fixed start_atomic_bh()/end_atomic_bh() in a similar manner?
>
Whoops, I saw that mentioned but did not implement. Will do that now,
could that be the cause? Sounded SMP to me.

> if you are using ktrace it's probably simpler to use a 'dummy' empty
> function which you call only if the bad condition happens. Thus it will
> show up in the ktrace.
>
Neat trick. You guys are amazing.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:55    [W:0.045 / U:1.768 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site