[lkml]   [1999]   [Dec]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: deadlock avoidance?
On Tue, Dec 07, 1999, Davide Libenzi <> wrote:
> Why not implement a new lock that keep the pid of the task that own the lock
> as long as a counter of
> locks.
> If the same task try to acquire the lock, increment the counter.
> On counter == 0, release the lock.

Do interrupts have a unique pid?


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:55    [W:0.071 / U:0.048 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site