Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 7 Dec 1999 17:31:19 -0500 | From | Johannes Erdfelt <> | Subject | Re: deadlock avoidance? |
| |
On Tue, Dec 07, 1999, Davide Libenzi <dlibenzi@maticad.it> wrote: > Why not implement a new lock that keep the pid of the task that own the lock > as long as a counter of > locks. > If the same task try to acquire the lock, increment the counter. > On counter == 0, release the lock.
Do interrupts have a unique pid?
JE
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |