lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Dec]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: deadlock avoidance?
On Tue, Dec 07, 1999, Davide Libenzi <dlibenzi@maticad.it> wrote:
> Why not implement a new lock that keep the pid of the task that own the lock
> as long as a counter of
> locks.
> If the same task try to acquire the lock, increment the counter.
> On counter == 0, release the lock.

Do interrupts have a unique pid?

JE


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:55    [W:0.055 / U:0.264 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site