lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Dec]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] Re: setitimer lowlatency-2.2.13-A1 questions
Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
> It's not safe as do_bottom_half can return with irq disabled and it's not
> safe to reenable the irqs inside enable_bh if enable_bh is be called with
> irq disabled. I fixed both problems in this alternate patch (not compiled
> too ;):

Is there a special reason why do_bottom_half() calls __sti() and __cli()
directly? This seems wrong, what about using the normal
__save_flags()/__sti()/__restore_flags()?

--
Manfred

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:55    [W:0.066 / U:38.904 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site