[lkml]   [1999]   [Dec]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Can't hardlink in different dirs. (BUG#826)
    Andrea Arcangeli writes:
    > On Fri, 3 Dec 1999, Richard Gooch wrote:
    > >[..] I can definately say that
    > >making hardlinks to files in other directories (not owned by the
    > >linking user) is a handy feature. [..]
    > For what exactly is it an handy feature? I never needed to hardlink
    > to a file that I don't own, so you would convince me if you would
    > raise good points.

    I deal (both as a user and as an administrator) with large data
    files. I or other users often want to grab a copy of a file that
    belongs to a colleague so we can look at it too. A symlink is no good
    because the colleague may want to remove the file shortly after
    informing others.

    A copy is no good because the file is big. A gigabyte here, a gigabyte
    there, sooner or later it adds up to real space.

    A hard link is the ideal solution. Many users can "lock" the file so
    that they will retain access to it without consuming more space. When
    each user has lost interest, the space is reclaimed.

    As a sysadmin, I prefer to make a few very large filesystems rather
    than many smaller ones (where small >= 2 GiB) for data storage, so
    that hard linking can be done frequently.



    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:55    [W:0.025 / U:42.712 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site